SoloLuck

Compare

← back to pool

How SoloLuck compares

Solo mining is a lottery on every pool — the block odds are identical no matter where you point your miner. So choose on the things that actually differ: fee, latency to your region, encryption, and features. Here is an honest side-by-side — we are not the cheapest, so pick what fits you.

 SoloLucksolo.ckpool.orgPublic PoolAtlasPool
Fee2% of block reward2% of block reward0% (affiliate-funded)1.5% of full reward
True per-miner solo✓ Yes✓ Yes✓ Yes✓ Yes
Encrypted stratum (TLS) · :3334✗ No · :4333 · :4333
Account / KYCNoneNoneNoneNone
Open sourcePartial — ckpool core, closed UI (GPLv3) (GPLv3)Partial — ckpool core, closed UI
Per-address stats page · /users/<addr> · /users/<addr> · web UI · operator UI
CPU-friendly low-diff tier · Nano (diff 1)Min ~400 GH/s
Dedicated CPU mining app · Windows app
Primary server regionAsia · JakartaUS / EU / SG / AUSingle USAnycast · 8 PoPs / 6 continents
Stratum latency from Indonesia~6 ms · Jakarta~17 ms · SG node~250 ms · US~6 ms · anycast
Site languages10EnglishEnglishEnglish

Where SoloLuck stands out: Asia-based low latency (~6 ms from Indonesia vs ~250 ms to US solo pools), encrypted TLS stratum, a CPU-friendly Nano tier (plus a one-click Windows app), live per-address stats, and a 10-language site. Where others win: Public Pool takes 0%, and AtlasPool runs global multi-region anycast. On all of them the block reward is paid on-chain straight to your address.

So which should you pick?

⚡ Ping Race — measure your own latency to each pool →

Whatever you choose, keep your own BTC address as the username — that is what makes it true solo. See /status for our live hashrate and block count, and /verify for how to check every claim yourself.

Competitor details verified June 2026 from each pool's public docs; they can change — confirm on the pool's own site before deciding.